Pearson













Subscribe to SLP eNEWS - our FREE monthly eNewsletter. Enter your e-mail address:





2008 | 2007 | 2006-2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002



October 2002
Insights from Pearson Assessments Development
Terminology 201: Articulation and Phonology (At Your Request)

One of our colleagues emailed recently with the request, "Can you clarify for all of us when it is appropriate to use the terms articulation or phonology when reporting test results?" This is certainly an important matter to clarify! Phonology is a newer concept than articulation in this field, and not everyone has had the opportunity to study both in detailed comparison and contrast.

More Information




September 2002
Insights from Pearson Assessments Development
Tests Don't Diagnose . . .You Do! The Difference Between Testing and Assessment

What exactly do test, assessment, and diagnosis mean? And what impact do the use and understanding of these terms have on clinical decision-making?

More Information



July 2002
Insights from Pearson Assessments Development
Speech Assessment - How Deep Can You Go? (in no time at all)?

If speech development were easy, children wouldn't need speech-language pathologists. But easy it is not. Speech production uses a set of arbitrary sounds and sound combinations that are based on an equally arbitrary set of rules (Kent, 1998, in Bernthal & Bankson, 1998). Unfortunately, children don't always master these rules in the same way. Enter the need for speech assessment and time-consuming analysis and interpretation.

More Information



June 2002
Insights from Pearson Assessments Development
Test-Retest Reliability - The Good, the Bad, and the Judgement Calls

Overall, test-retest reliability is an index of temporal stability. It tells how much the individual's normative score might possibly change on retesting if a period of time has elapsed between test administrations…When making a decision on retesting, follow the steps below.

More Information



May 2002
Insights from Pearson Assessments Development
Articulation and Phonology Are Not Normally Distributed - Who Cares? You Do!

Since the publication of the GFTA-2, questions have been raised about the difference between scores on the 1986 edition of GFTA and the GFTA-2. The 1986 GFTA norms were percentiles extrapolated from two different databases: the National Speech and Hearing Survey (Hull, Mielke, Willeford, & Timmons, 1976) and the Khan and Lewis work of 1986. The use of two unrelated databases collected at two different points in time is part of the reason for score differences. However, the key reason for the difference in scores lies in how the normative scores were developed.

More Information





Pearson AGS Assessments are now part of Pearson's Assessment group,
Phone: 800.627.7271    |    Inquiries: pearsonassessments@pearson.com

ASHA Partnership
© 2005-2007, Pearson Education or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy    |    Terms & Conditions