Our Blogs

Share in practical tips and insights, inside information, stories and recollections, and expert advice..

Entries Tagged With: GFTA-2

“Articulation and Phonology Are Not Normally Distributed-Who cares? You do! “


Clinical Café by Tina Radichel, M.S., CCC-SLP

Periodically we see a trend in calls and e-mail questions from customers. Because you are a distinguished member of the SLPForum, we’d like to supply you with a bit of continuing education that may help you and your colleagues in your day-to-day clinical practice. We would also like to offer you a FREE gift in this e-mail, so read on!

Our particular insight this issue relates to the more accurate scores available from the GFTA-2 and KLPA-2 results. Grab a cup of coffee and sit back for a two-minute read that will save you hours of thinking time later.

Since the publication of the GFTA-2, questions have been raised about the difference between scores on the 1986 edition of GFTA and the GFTA-2. The 1986 GFTA norms were percentiles extrapolated from two different databases: the National Speech and Hearing Survey (Hull, Mielke, Willeford, & Timmons, 1976) and the Khan and Lewis work of 1986. The use of two unrelated databases collected at two different points in time is part of the reason for score differences. However, the key reason for the difference in scores lies in how the normative scores were developed.

The psychometrician who worked on the original GFTA norms applied the methods of normative score development based on a “normal” distribution of data. This method did not result in scores that appropriately represented the extremes of the distributions of articulation errors for each age. For example, according to the 1986 norms, a female who was aged 6 years 6 months and made no errors would have a percentile rank of 99. This would mean that only 1 percent of girls that age made no errors. Of course, this is not true. According to the GFTA-2 norms, the percentile rank for girls at 6-6 making no errors is appropriately listed at >65. This means that, at this age, 65 percent make one or more errors and 35 percent make no errors. Speech-language pathologists know, and research on normal articulation development tells us, that this is a more accurate representation.

As stated in the GFTA-2 manual, articulation ability is not normally distributed in the general population in the same way as many other abilities. The expectation that children master all sound production by age 8 makes the “normal curve” for articulation inherently skewed. Many state/district’s qualification criteria for special services are based on a system of using percentiles derived from forcing articulation data into a normalized distribution scale. Forcing data in this manner is not appropriate based on articulation development.

Here’s another example: If a boy who is 4-6 has a percentile rank of 2 on the 1986 GFTA or on another articulation test with scores developed by forcing the data into a normalized distribution, this would equate to a standard score of 70. This score is two standard deviations (SDs) below the mean and represents a significant difference or distance from average. Alternatively, if this same boy gets a standard score of 70 on the GFTA-2, he would have a percentile rank of 6. This rank of 6 is equivalent to the percentile rank of 2 on a “normalized” distribution or on a test developed by those means. In either case, this child’s articulation is significantly different from normal or average and is in need of remediation.

So you are now saying, “Help! Now what?”

If you need to incorporate GFTA-2 non-normalized distribution results into a qualification system that is based on a normalized distribution system, here’s what you do:

  • Determine the cut-off percentile for services in your state/district.
      Example:
      the 10th percentile.
  • Look at the “Percentile Rank to Standard Score Table” in the norms section of one of your favorite tests that is based on the bell curve.
      Examples:
      PPVT-III Norms Booklet – Page 44
      EVT Manual – Page 172
      CASL Norms Book – Page 121
      OWLS LC/OE Manual – Page 183
  • According to this table based on a normalized distribution, determine the Standard Score that equates to your district/state cut-off.
      Example:
      10th Percentile = Standard Score of 81.
  • Use this Standard Score as your qualification criteria instead of the percentile rank on the GFTA-2.
      Example:
      In a system based on normalized distribution criteria, any child who receives a Standard Score of 81 or below on the GFTA-2 would qualify for services.

Voila!

As stated in this example, if your school district/state uses a specific percentile (10th), this is equivalent to a standard score of 81 in a normal distribution. The standard score of 81 represents a specific variance from average (regardless of the distribution). Because articulation is not normally distributed, using the standard score of 81 allows you to keep the same reference point (as different from average). The percentiles vary depending on the age of the child, but his or her reference to average does not. Keeping the metric of 81 as your cut-off means that you are serving the children who are similarly discrepant from average regardless of age.

Compare your test results using this FREE booklet!

Call AGS Publishing Customer Service at 1-800-328-2560 or submit the online contact form to get your complimentary GFTA-2 Supplemental/Developmental Norms Booklet (Ask for item number 11754). Using the information presented in this booklet, you can check, for example, that a male child aged 4-6 should have mastered the articulation of 29 of the 77 sounds possible on the GFTA-2 (using 90% as the acquisition level cut-off). Compare the GFTA-2 test results to the developmental normative data to determine which sounds are developmentally appropriate and which are not. Then you can base your therapy strategy on this information.

Here’s something else . . .

We recently published Khan Lewis Phonological Analysis – Second Edition (KLPA-2). The KLPA-2 (item number 11820) is a norm-referenced, in-depth analysis of overall phonological process usage. It is a companion tool for the GFTA-2 articulation test. The KLPA-2 was designed to provide further diagnostic information on the 53 target words elicited by the GFTA-2 Sounds-in-Words. This tool will help you deepen your analysis of speech sound patterns.

In closing, we’d like to thank you for your ongoing service to people with communication needs and we are here to support you with that effort. Assessment analysis and interpretation is an important topic for our field; if you’d like to discuss this topic further, please feel free to use the SLPForum Discussion Center as the vehicle for an ongoing discussion with your colleagues.

http://www.speechandlanguage.com/forum/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi

Should you have questions regarding these or other Pearson Speech and Language products, we welcome your phone calls at 800-627-7271 or use our web site at http://ags.pearsonassessments.com.

Enjoy the spring!

GFTA-2 Supplemental Developmental Norms


So what’s the big deal about a little 16-page booklet? It’s a big deal when it goes with the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation – Second Edition (GFTA-2). It’s a big deal when it’s the foundation of a major presentation for AGS Director of Development, Dr. Kathleen Williams, along with Dr. Ronald Goldman and Dr. Macalyne Fristoe at the 75th American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) convention in Washington, DC. It’s a big deal because the data contained in these 16 pages is groundbreaking. Nothing like the data in this little booklet has been produced in at least 25 years. And previous studies have not included as large or as well-stratified and well-controlled a sample as the GFTA-2 standardization sample. What does all this mean? It’s a big deal. As you may already be aware, the GFTA-2 is one of AGS’ hottest new products. The GFTA-2 is a systematic measure of articulation of consonant sounds for children and young adults. The test has been in use for over 30 years, but it has been reenergized just this year with a major revision.

So what is this booklet for? The GFTA-2 Supplemental Developmental Norms includes an extensive data set for order of consonant and consonant cluster sound development, based on the GFTA-2 nationwide standardization sample. The GFTA-2 provides normative scores, but these scores may only provide a global measure of a child’s articulation ability based on the number of errors. Most clinicians will still want to compare individual performance on each specific sound to a standard of developmental acquisition in order to do an appropriate evaluation and therapy plan. Using this data, clinicians can set their own developmental age markers, or mastery age, for the correct production or mastery of each consonant sound. Clinicians can then establish their own developmental criteria for each individual case or for their particular clinical setting based on this controlled GFTA-2 standardization sample. The booklet provides the percentages at which children in the GFTA-2 standardization sample could correctly produce each sound. With this information, speech paths can create local criterion-referenced cut-offs. For example, they may set a cut-off of 85%. If a child of the same gender and age can not make a sound that 85% of the sample could make – the error would be considered nondevelopmental and should be addressed by articulation therapy.

This data set was the “meat” of Drs. Williams, Goldman, and Fristoe’s ASHA presentation. The booklet was available at the ASHA convention, and will be packaged with the GFTA-2 kits thereafter.

Meet Dr. Ron Goldman


Left to right- Kathleen Williams (EVT Author), Ron Goldman, Dr. Macalyne Fristoe (GFTA Co-Author)

Do you use the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation? The Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock? How about Listening to the World? Sounds and Symbols?

The common denominator for all of these products (and several others) is Dr. Ron Goldman. In addition to his work as a busy author, Dr. Goldman has served as the training director for the Sparks Center for Developmental and Learning Disorders, the president of the American Speech-Language Hearing Foundation (ASHF), and the vice president of planning for the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA). He has also participated on committees and review boards for organizations including the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), the Louisiana Speech and Hearing Association, the Speech and Hearing Association of Alabama, the Tennessee Speech and Hearing Association, the National Institutes of Health, and the U.S. Department of Education. He has received numerous awards for his work, including fellowship status by ASHA and their highest award, the Honors of the Association, for which the recipient’s achievements must be “of such excellence that they have enhanced or altered the course of our profession,” according to ASHA bylaws.

Dr. Goldman has been retired for seven years, but his schedule shows no sign of slowing down. He is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Alabama-Birmingham and has recently completed the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation, Second Edition (GFTA-2), with Dr. Macalyne Fristoe. Dr. Goldman describes the new edition of the popular test as “a refinement of a highly successful, frequently used test.”

He notes, “It was a challenge to select appropriate art to prompt spontaneous responses. We needed to provide stimulus items using interesting pictures that would elicit pertinent responses. The standardization was challenging, too. We worked hard to make sure it is all-inclusive.”

Dr. Goldman will be on hand at the ASHA convention in Washington, D.C., in November to discuss the development of both the original Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation and the new edition. Along with Dr. Macalyne Fristoe and Dr. Kathleen Williams, Dr. Goldman will discuss the supplementary developmental norms gathered from the GFTA-2 standardization data. Many research studies have attempted to set developmental markers by age for the correct production of each consonant sound. No study has included as large or as well-stratified and well-controlled a sample as the GFTA-2 standardization sample.

Now, Dr. Goldman has another revision in the works. A new edition of the Sounds & Symbols Early Reading Program (previously published as the Goldman-Lynch Sounds and Symbols Development Kit and High Hat) will be completed by August 2001. A renewed emphasis on phonics and a corresponding demand for the early reading program have prompted this new edition. (Ed. note: See SLP e-news article “High Hat is Back” for more details.)

“Personally, I think this project is one of the most productive intervention programs I’ve worked on,” noted Dr. Goldman. “There’s been a phenomenal response from its users.”

The new version will feature all new art and updated stories and lessons, with content revised for gender and ethnic balance and cultural appropriateness. Dr. Goldman stresses, however, that “the heart of the Goldman-Lynch will be maintained.” “I think,” he continues, “that it will be widely used.” Based on the popularity of Dr. Goldman’s other tests and programs, and on customer response to the Sounds & Symbols project so far, success seems assured!

Plan to attend the joint ASHA presentation by Dr. Ron Goldman, Dr. Macalyne Fristoe, and Dr. Kathleen Williams: “GFTA-2 Developmental Norms by Gender and Consonant Sound” (Session 614), Thursday, November 16, 2000 8:00-9:30 a.m.